Sound and security – a new world of simplicity

I am fascinated with voice/sound technology. I think further development of these technologies will revolutionize computing and make devices simpler to use. My hero, Steve Wozniak (in my opinion the real man behind Apple – without him they would have had nothing to sell), praised Siri and how convenient it is. I've used Siri a little bit – and I need to ask it more questions to get more familiar with its capabilities – and although there is work to be done, it's highly convenient. For some basic search and command tasks – she's invaluable.  

There are some reasons why voice and sound technology hasn't taken off as much as it could have. Part of it I think is the technology is very new and needs more work; part of it is that we aren't used to speaking commands to a device; part of it is that voice commands and technology isn't very private in a public setting (we value the privacy of our thoughts and speaking makes them public). But I won't go into all of this today – I'll save that for later. 

However, there are some companies working on this – and they may get this to take off.

SlickLogin from Israel (now acquired by Google) allows you to login to a computer through sound technology. You tap a login button on your computer or browser, put your phone next to your computer and you are in. The devices emit a high-frequency sound that the other device can pick up and validate. Humans can't actively hear the sound. Sure there are some challenges – you could be using someone else's phone. According to TechCrunch, "The service was built to be used either as a password replacement, or as a secondary, Two-Factor authentication layer on top of a traditional password."

Talk about simplifying login! We could do away with those crazy personal questions and maddening processes that are just not user friendly

This may pave the way for user-friendly voice passwords. Voice is so difficult because of the inflections and consistency – it requires incredible time to process. However, if a team can find an algorithm to find commonality when someone says a word if he is hurried, bothered, upset, happy, whatever – that would more than simplify the login and security process for all devices and applications. And what if there wasn't a word necessary for the password – just a tone. Wow! Imagine the simplicity. You don't have to worry about forgetting a code or recovering it. It would just be easy. 

And it may open the door for sound technology to evolve for other uses.

Exciting things are coming, I think. What is your view about these technologies? (Security experts – it would be great to hear from you)

Sound and security – a new world of simplicity

Could UX have expanded into CX and evolved organizations to be more customer focused? Part 2

I think in the early days of the Web, we unknowningly limited ourselves. We made sure the Web expeirence was fantastic, but chose not to take our recommendations one step further to phones, to fax, to in-person experiences. There was an perception that the Web would eventually replace all that – which didn't happen (I'm not sure where that would have come from – what kind of future vision is that where people are sitting at home all day staring at a screen…but anyway…). 

And there was a perception that the Web would redefine business to the point of redefining industries and age old business processes – which doesn't make a ton of sense (I have plenty of examples of this). Either way – it was a time of revolution on the old ways of doing business to create something new. It was optimistic and a little naive.

That's all probably why we didn't see the phone or store experiences as part of our job to consider. When I worked at Blue Shield of California, one of the many Directors of User Experience had one of her information architects work on an IVR line. She was trying to get us to this Customer Experience level of influence, but her team was spread so thin, this influence didn't take. She was on to something – UX should have grown to CX.

The UX teams I worked on always learned about the entire customer experience on- and off-line to create the ultimate Web experience. We wanted to mirror the off-line experience on-line. To know which features to include on a shopping Web site, for example, it helps to know how things are sold in a store or over a phone. And it helps to know how your audience thinks and approaches a shopping in general. Add to that knowledge system limitations or challenges – databases, security, hardware to give more insight into additional design considerations to make it easy to use. Yes – it all contributed to the final design. 

Designers typically find solutions to problems. Engineers are similar to designers – except they use more math and science. As we found problems and challenges, we would raise these to the business and think about Web solutions to make things easier for the user to get what he needs or wants. At times, this meant that we would have something slightly different on-line to accommodate systems. Or there would be investment to make it better on-line than the phone.  

The entire customer experience was fractured, but at times, the on-line process would be beautiful. 

There was a struggle with ownership (there is still is in some ways…and we didn't follow the money). The Web teams sometimes tried to own things that they really didn't own, mainly creating  a struggle with the business. We should have really focused on the user's experience with the company as a whole, and elevated what we were doing on the Web to become Customer Experience.

But that's the past – and we should learn from it. 

What could we have done differently?

  • Show how the issues with the Web site impacted the experiences elsewhere. It would have been so EASY. We had the illustration tools, we had the insights, we had the models, at times we even had the vision. We just needed to illustrate to the business what we were talking about and they probably would have gone along with our ideas. We didn't go that extra mile to show how the database change could have helped the call center. We just talked to it. We could have done more.
  • Show the influence of the Web on other communication channels. Someone may shop on-line and buy in the store (or vice versa). Or even call to place an order. As I mentioned above, we didn't illustrate the entire experience all the way through. And we had the vision! We could have made massive changes to the business years ago.
  • Focused on customers/prospects or buyers rather than users only. I think we lost the battle with words. I know – it sounds petty. But we were talking about people visiting the site rather than people saving us money or buying something or serving an audience in some way. Being so technical about users hurt us, I think. We couldn't get the business to personalize them and see the connection between their behaviors and the end result for the business. It was just too clinical, technical, and dis-associative for everyone to understand what we were talking about.
  • We limited our own minds and worked on the project at hand. It's great to focus on scope and do what you can, but at times, being too focused on scope limits imagination and possibilities. Maybe we could have had more innovation if we saw how every customer contact point would work? 
  • Bite off the right amount – not too much and not too little. I know I just contradicted myself, but sometimes we were so tied up in a project's scope – we couldn't see the forest through the trees. And sometimes we took on so much it was just impossible to do. We didn't really understand incremental change in the early days of the Web. We also didn't understand the power of suggestion and how we didn't have to do everything today. We could have at least seeded some ideas.
  • Influence change rather than dictate change. You can't make people change; you have to encourage change. Many times, business teams would be afraid of what I was proposing – it was just too much scope to do for the next launch. However, by telling them we didn't need to fix the problem today, that got them to put the issue into the queue and prioritize it with everything else. In addition, it got the team thinking about ways to improve the system. Imagine if we suggested changing the phones and offline experience in addition to the Web? Or if we provided phone scripts to complement a new business idea? Yep. Revolutionary.
  • We positioned ourselves as magicians. That was probably one of our biggest mistakes – and is always a huge mistake in the IT industry anyway. People thought what we did was unique and required special training. Sure, some of us had it, but most of us honestly were self-taught. We should have tried to educate our colleagues more and tried to intimidate them less (even though that can be fun…wait – did I just say that out loud?).

I think this is why I moved to do more Customer Experience work – I wanted to be involved in designing the complete experience and how the channels come together for a customer to make a purchase or get support. This is definitely more fun! So yes, I think UX could have evolved and we missed a great opportunity. 

What are your thoughts? Could UX from the early days have expanded into CX and evolved further? Is maybe this call for evolution is the key to creating a design organization? 

For more information about UX/CX: 

 

Could UX have expanded into CX and evolved organizations to be more customer focused? Part 2

Could UX have expanded into CX and evolved organizations? Part 1

It's only been about 3 months since I realized that I'm a Customer Experience professional disguised as a User Experience designer. I've always been a CX professional – even early in my career. 

And I wonder if many frustrated UX professionals are also CX professionals in disguise?

Many years ago when I was leading a Web team, I realized how much we were contributing to defining and refining processes. I couldn't understand how our work wasn't taken more seriously. Web teams I worked on were leading branding efforts, workflow efforts, automation efforts. But yet, the Web remained a channel within a business team (marketing or product) rather than emerging as a team that was evolving the business. We were like consultants, proposing changes to a business but never having enough ownership claim to make the changes. It was discouraging.

And I often watch UX teams proposing great changes to make a user's experience with the company on the Web site better, but they are limited because the internal systems don't work that way or the business doesn't work that way. Change rarely happens because the right conversations aren't happening. We keep talking about users on a site rather than customers and buyers in an organization and how a change could benefit everyone and contribute to the bottom line.

I want to explore:

  • Why some UX people are CX people (and vice versa)
  • This separation of UX and CX and UX being a part of CX
  • Did CX grow out of UX?
  • Why UX needs revenue responsbility (I believe CX can do this)
  • Why the Web didn't transform and evolve companies in the way it could have
  • and more

I invite you participate in the discussion this week and potentially next (feel free to start contributing your thoughts about this now). Stay tuned for the discussion – each day it will be a slightly different topic.

 

Could UX have expanded into CX and evolved organizations? Part 1

How do you get people to listen to your message and be engaged?

Make them shut off their phones, stop multi-tasking and focus.

I know – easier said than done.

It's hard to get a buyer to do this. You can't control what they do. You can't make them listen to you. But you can find ways to entice them to stop what they are doing and listen.

I work within a team that is spread out across the world. We are on the phone literally all day long. That sounds like a dream, but I'll tell you – at the end of the day, I'm exhausted. I'd rather sit in a meeting room and focus on the conversation at hand rather than be on a phone, trying to focus. But there is the benefit of being able to work in dance/workout clothes every day – and I like that. Moving on…

The challenge with all of these calls is getting people to stop multi-tasking and listen. Everyone is so busy with things to do – emails to answers, presentation to write, work to be done – that they aren't present in the phone meeting. I can't begin to tell you how many times I have had to repeat myself in meetings because people just aren't listening. And they don't read their emails – they skim (which is obvious in some responses that ask questions which are answered in the emails or address emails to the wrong people because they are moving so fast, they didn't read the message all  the way through).

I know I'm guilty of this too – and I catch myself in meetings zoning out, working on something else. I shouldn't do that – but I do.

And sure, you can make it all simpler to understand. But if people aren't even present to understand what you are saying, it's like the tree that falls in the forest – if no one is there, did it really fall? If people zone out and aren't listening, does it matter how beautiful or ugly your slides are?

I notice how executives act in meetings and on calls – they are present and they are listening. They aren't multi-tasking. Well, they do when the decisions are made and there is chit chat going on. This is why they are so effective. They have mastered the art of listening and being present.

In in-person meetings you can't escape listening. If you are messing around with your phone, someone will call you out on it. Or else, someone will ask everyone to shut off their phones. Or collect the phones before the meeting. And it is rude not to listen to someone in a meeting. You have to at least pretend.

We had something similar at jury duty (I know, I'm milking that experience for all it is worth). The bailiff gave us complex instructions for lining up and entering the courtroom to keep things organized for the scribe. Everyone did as told without question because we were listening without distraction. In the jury waiting area, we were told to shut off our phones. Sure, some of us (me included) checked email – but not while we were in the courtroom or getting orders from the bailiff. It was amazing how everyone understood instructions when they were listening and not distracted.

That's when I realized the key to getting people to listen to you and engage with you is to get them to put their distractions away and focus.

But how do you do that to a buyer that you can't order around? Here are some ideas that I came up with:

  • Find something that will capture their attention for 2-3 minutes. Let them know it will only take a few minutes and it won't interfere with their day. It's like when someone asks you if you have time for taking a survey – they tell you it will take 10 minutes or so. If you have a few – you do it. If you don't – you come back later or forget it. 
  • Have a way for them to look at your stuff when they have a break. One challenge of social media channels can be how many updates you get in a short time and how hard it can be to find the update that captured your attention 5 minutes ago. Some people may click on the link and watch things later, but there has to be another way to remind people of what captured their interest. Email campaigns work (if you have the person's email address). If you are trying to capture someone's attention (and email address), try sending the same link out at a couple of different times of day, over a day or two, to get attention (mixed with other messages). I haven't fully solved this problem and would like to hear what has worked for you – please feel free to comment below…
  • Appeal to their pain. If you are solving a problem that they have – yep, they will listen.
  • Talk in their language. If they are technical people, talk technical. If they are marketing people, speak marketing. 
  • Be original and fun. You know what gets passed around at the office and shared? Not the boring corporate video or white paper. Remember that Landlord video from Funny or Die? Or the SNL skit with Lawrence Welk and the Sisters? Those were shared everywhere because they were funny. People took time to watch them because they were entertaining. You could say it happened because these aren't work related videos, and that's true. However, work doesn't have to be boring. We choose to make it boring. And there are fun work videos out there to…just not enough of them.
  • Don't make yourself white noise. You know that person at work who arranges a bunch of meetings that drone on for hours? Or the company that just keeps talking about itself? Do you listen to those things? I know I don't. I want to hear something new and fresh – not the same old boring thing. Your buyers think the same way.

That's all I got for now.

But I'm curious…what have you done that has gotten customers to listen to your message and engaged? 

 

 

 

How do you get people to listen to your message and be engaged?

10 Things I Learned from Jury Duty about Outstanding Customer Experiences and Respecting Buyers – Part 2

Note: I changed the title of the blog entry after I realized where I was going with it. It's fun to do this on the fly sometimes! Apologies in advance for any confusion.

Read what happened before the courtroom experience.

I took the elevator with the other jurors to get to the 4th floor (or was it 5th? Doesn't matter.) to walk to one of the courtrooms. We were silent, but in a generally good mood, smiling to each other and being polite and warm. I mean, the initial experiences were pretty good – so I was curious how this was going to go.

  • It always starts well when the bathroom is easy to find. One step off the elevator and  there it was! Convenient. I was loving how this courthouse was designed – it was just easy to navigate.
  • There were a number of chairs, benches and sofas outside the courtroom so most of us could sit down. I can't tell you how many times I have waited outside a courtroom, standing or leaning against a wall. Again, I felt like they wanted me there, offering me a place to sit and rest. I'm sure the chairs come in handy while people are mulling around waiting for a trial, but it is definitely convenient for jurors.
  • Once inside the courtroom – the attorneys made us feel comfortable. Go figure, right? I'll admit – it is stressful to be questioned by an attorney to be selected for a jury. They told us what we should expect, asked us questions, and got us engaged in conversation to get us relaxed. They even joked around with us. I don't remember attorneys joking with me in Massachusetts or California. 
  • The attorneys didn't make anyone feel bad about their beliefs or convictions that may have prevented them from participating in a jury. They appreciated the honesty and participation. In all honesty, if there are jurors feeling awkward about making certain decisions, that would hurt the outcome of the trial – so it really is in the best interest of the attorneys to weed out those who may have personal challenges with making particular judgements. Just being in a courtroom and serving could make someone feel obligated to participate – when in fact, the person isn't qualified based on his beliefs. These attorneys did a great job making everyone feel comfortable to express their true beliefs, trusting that we were all telling the truth and not trying to just weasel out of service.
  • Jury selection was done in 1.5 hours – super quick! Each side had 30 minutes to ask questions and 20 minutes to make decisions as to who to select. I have sat in jury panels for hours to get through jury selection – including lunch and other breaks – in California. This was efficient and effective.
  • We had an educational moment – the judge shared his opinion about the courts, the jury system and why  it is so important. He admitted that he didn't like that many of us had the perspective that there are too many lawsuits. His opinion was that lawsuits help us fight for our rights. I never saw it that way. And I'm sure other jurors didn't either. I then understood why people enter the legal profession and why they see it as important. Personally, I still think there are too many lawsuits, but at least now I get why people will take a dispute to court. 

It was definitely an interesting day.

But to sum it up – what makes a great customer experience? Respect for your buyer.

When I was at jury duty, I could be considered to be a buyer – I had to buy-in to the concept of participating in a jury.

Here 10 things I learned from my experience for how to respect my buyers that I plan to use when creating customer experiences in the future.

  • Respect people's time. Don't have them sitting around waiting idly for hours just because you know they can't do anything else until you give the next order. People have other things to do besides waiting for you to get your act together. (1.5 hour jury selection vs 5+ hour selection…which would you rather experience?)
  • Trust your buyers. Take what they say at face value. Sure, they may have a secret motive to get out of paying something (or jury service), but trust that they aren't. Most likely, they only have a point of view different from yours.
  • Make sure buyers are participants in the process – not there to "serve." I wasn't there to just do what I was told, when I was told. That's a shift in thinking that makes a world of difference in how you treat your buyer (or juror). I felt like I was part of the court that day. We were all on the same team to get something done – so we all tried to do things as efficiently and effectively as possible.
  • Buyers need to feel welcome. Sure, you need buyers to buy from you. They know that – but they don't need to be reminded of that. They are people too and want to be respected for what they are bringing to the table. Be a great host – offer a great environment for those buyers and don't have them worry about the logistical details. Offer convenient parking, easy directions, sofas – you get it.
  • They need  to understand why you do what you do. At jury duty, they took the time to explain everything to us so we could better understand the purpose of what we were doing and not see the activities as futile. Knowing that there was a "method to the madness" allowed everyone to buy-in the ideas and go along with the group. 
  • Humor and happiness is key. Humor disarms people and gets them to relax in a tense situation. And it makes the vibe light and airy – just more fun. Those attorneys definitely got us to open up – and got a better jury panel because of it. The happy, welcoming staff got everyone to relax – and made us feel just more at ease. It made for a nice, memorable day that we will share with others.
  • Get your buyers relaxed. This comes from being transparent about your process. Let your buyers know what to expect and it builds confidence in them that you are not wasting their time. Overview videos like I saw when I came in to jury duty help with that. 
  • Add an education component into the experience to make it memorable. If you look back at any shopping experience you had, the best experiences included an education component. You learned why a particular product was better or worse, about a service a business offered that would help you, or something that would benefit you personally. By learning how the judge viewed the judiciary process – I got something out of the experience and it changed my worldview. That's powerful.
  • Encourage your staff to interact with your buyers. No one is too important or busy not to take a few minutes to make a buyer feel important and special – even a judge. It's about being a good host and making people feel welcome. They are there to work with you – just like your team/employees. 
  • Technology is your friend – use it. In the early days of the Web, I used to hear how people didn't "get" it. That was understandable then – most people only got online at work, where there was an Internet connection (heck, I remember dial-up). But today, EVERYONE is online. Most people have a phone, a tablet (in fact, more people are using tables in place of a home computer) or a computer that has better Internet connections than some offices. You can make your customer experience that much better by integrating mobile and Web to take care of those paperwork/detail activities that are time-sucks. Why have people complete a paper form when you can have them go online and fill-out (or update) an electronic form that delivers the data to your Excel file? It's a win all the way around.

I'm still amazed at how the Dallas court system operates and has such a great customer experience. And from my perspective, they are using such a simple overarching approach and theme – respect the juror.  

I look forward to hearing your thoughts. Feel free to comment!

10 Things I Learned from Jury Duty about Outstanding Customer Experiences and Respecting Buyers – Part 2

10 Things I Learned from Jury Duty about Outstanding Customer Experiences and Respecting Buyers – Part 1

A couple of weeks ago on a Wednesday, I spent the first half of my day at jury duty. I typically dread Jury Duty. I understand the whole "being of service to your nation" thing – and I agree with that – but I hate watching everyone's time wasted during my "service." My project manager brain starts calculating the dollars-per-hour of productivity spent on waiting to participate in a trial. I just want to get them all busy doing something besides staring out into space.  

In my typical juror experience, I watch:

  • the judge waiting for a jury to be selected and have the trial 
  • the attorneys shuffling through papers (we wonder why fees are so high – look at the time wasted in a courtroom!)
  • the potential jurors watching attorneys shuffle papers and a judge waiting for action

Sad!

Why does productivity loss bother me so much? I hate seeing people not respecting other people's time. It is a pet peeve. Sure, we were serving our country so we are technically available all day, but there was no acknowledgement that we were there willingly to be of service and leaving our other responsibilities to be a good citizen. We weren't there to witness mass inefficiency and disorganization. 

The experience I had in Dallas was FAR different than what I witnessed in other cities – and I think it was because I felt respected as a person with other responsibilities, and they appreciated my participation to help the judicial process. I knew this was true with jury duty, but I never FELT it in other cities.

How did they do this? It all started before I even entered a court room for selection.

  • They cared enough to be sure that we had a decent place to park. Parking was connected to the building – no need to go outside and get cold. I found a space easily and got into the building quickly. A very pleasant experience. Sure it cost $3, but that is better than $10.
  • The Juror Room was easy to find. As soon as I finished getting scanned for possessing dangerous objects, the Jury Room was literally right in front of me. I didn't need to go through a maze of elevators and hallways. Easy peasy. It was turning into an easy day.
  • I could submit some basic information about me before coming to save time with juror selection. Dallas encourages jurors to complete surveys online – basically information about what they do, where they live, etc. These surveys provide the attorneys general information about the jurors and save them time from asking similar questions in a courtroom. I did mine at home the night before, but there were computers in the lobby available for the unprepared to get caught up. It was so convenient. And they pre-populated the form with as much information that they had on-file to make the process easier. 
  • I was greeted by a happy employee when I was scanned in – I felt welcome. Yes, a happy government employee was working there, joking around with the people coming in for duty. It made my day! I started jury duty with an smile. I didn't feel like my presence was an inconvenience; I felt like they wanted me there   
  • They respected the jurors enough to provide us with a clean place to wait. I went into a clean smelling, theater room that was freshly painted and in great shape. The seats were clean – I didn't see any stains. No trash, stains or odd smells. I felt like I was waiting in a large corporate meeting space.
  • They didn't waste my time having me watching a boring video – I learned something. I thought the video was going to be some "feel good" video that hyped up why we were there for jury duty, how important our presence was in democracy, and all sorts of things that a cynic like me tends to see through and find to be a waste of time. But it wasn't. I learned what to expect in a trial if I were chosen – what the process would be during the trial and what to expect. I got more relaxed and actually felt like the people managing us cared about our experience. I started to  care about how my day was going to go and was excited to be there. Yes, I was excited to be at jury duty to contribute to democracy.
  • The judge managing the jurors cared enough to thank us and welcome us. After the video, the judge who managed the jury pool came forward and thanked us for coming and serving. A judge actually welcomed us. I felt valued because he took time out of his day to do this and he cared enough to talk to us about what we were doing and why it was so important.
  • Then we were welcomed by the manager – he cared too. I felt like they were happy to have us there. I was now happy to be there too.
  • We started our day quickly. I only did work on my iPad for 30 minutes. That's it. I was assigned to a court and guided on my way. So far everything was fast, easy and productive. People seemed to care that we were contributing – and I started to care too.
 
More in Part 2 – when I got to the courtroom. The day just kept getting better…I'll bring together how outstanding customer experience requires respect in the next post.
10 Things I Learned from Jury Duty about Outstanding Customer Experiences and Respecting Buyers – Part 1