Technology for convenience vs Technology for efficiency/connectedness

Technology is supposed to make our lives easier. At work, it has boosted our productivity beyond expectations. We no longer need a pool of typists to create documents – it's now self-service with a computer and printer. We have accounting software that provides the most financially ignorant a way to maintain their books. There are RFID chips and scanning technologies available that help track inventory and revenue that would have previously caused a quarterly one- to two-day shutdown to double check records. We can now be reached by anyone, anytime, anywhere with mobile technologies. It's quite impressive how far we have come in such a short time.

However, there is a price: we are rarely unplugged and often focused on being "efficient." Technology is dictating life to us rather than the other way around.

I love weekends because it's when I choose to be inefficient. The phone and email isn't running my life. I'm not focused on finishing my to-do list, except for a few errands, and more focused on living life. 

This is why I'm not a fan of the concept of "wearable technology." It's one thing to have better fabrics that don't show perspiration or stops smells, but it is another thing to integrate the Internet and phone technologies into earrings or a watch. Innovations like Google glass are a great step forward – no doubt. But for those of us who no longer multi-task and instead, focus on the moment at hand and don't want constant connection, it's a challenging concept. It's almost like we can't escape being connected. I grew up in a small town and even there, someone could escape to the corner of a park and be completely alone for a few hours. Technology is getting a little too in our faces – literally. Even tracking all of your physical activity to determine how many calories you burn – isn't that getting a little intrusive? What happened to walking just to walk – or climbing stairs just to make a destination? 

I often wonder why we won't incorporate technology in our home to improve our quality of life. I'm not talking about incorporating connection technologies – I'm talking about making life more convenient. I have some initial thoughts below. Sure, some need more thought and I hope some are in progress to be made (let me know if they are – look forward to it!).

Home server – I'm not thinking about access to the cloud, I'm talking about having a server at home that stores files (music, photos, etc.) and there is a way for people to access them from any device in any location at home. And yes – there would be no way for your neighbor to access them. There are so many times I want to access a movie, but I don't want to download it from a cloud or stream it (that's slow) – I want to play from my speedier home network. I also don't want to use rented space to store the file. I want to use MY space that isn't shared and has a partition from the outside world. Sure, there is a risk that it could be hacked, but I'd feel better if I had access to a server that isn't necessarily connected to the internet and I'd use a local network to get files. 

Home doctor – rather than going to the doctor's office, we could save on health care costs (and insurance) by having a "home doctor" in the bathroom. I don't see why a device couldn't be created that could do urine and blood testing, track temperatures, weight, and be a virtual medical book. There could even be some type of scanner included in the kit – maybe something hand-held. If test results and symptoms hinted at a medical condition, the "home doctor" could suggest you see a real doctor – and maybe even book an appointment. And in compliance with HIPAA regulations, this could be stored in the safety of your home and not shared unless you chose to share it.

I mean, let's face it – who likes giving a urine sample at the doctors? It is messy and uncomfortable. Wouldn't it be easier to use a wand to indicate on the spot what is wrong? Why can't we do this today?

Home cooking – access online recipes in a single place (yes, I'm thinking of an aggregator that compiles recipes from online sources, cookbooks and your own entries), built into the counter. Once you select what you want to make, your system tells you what you don't have in your kitchen, suggests some substitutions or indicates which stores in the area may have what you need, and pre-heats your oven for whatever you are making. Much of this technology is available today. And no, it doesn't need to be connected to the Internet to track your inventory and provide substitution information. This could be a on a private network to maintain security, leveraging information from the Internet as needed. And there could be manual overrides to give someone more control if needed.

Home entrances – There needs to be more thought required here to ensure security – but rather than having keys to get into a home (a dated approach to security anyway), why not use retinal scans? Let's say you have local retinal scans to ensure you live in your home. When your scan is successful, you walk into your home, the lights and heat goes on and all is good. If the scan fails, some type of intruder message is played. And if someone breaks in, same thing. And you could keep people out easily. It may cause some interesting young sibling interactions (brothers and sisters deleting access from each other), but it would definitely more secure than a key. And no more worrying about losing your keys.

Virtual/robot butler – wouldn't it be great if you were in the middle of cooking a meal, the phone rings, and a voice says, "Mary, it is your mother. Do you want to accept the call?" and I can talk to my mom on speaker. Or I get an email from a friend, or an urgent work email, and I get an announcement about it – or a reminder that I need to respond. Or I decide to watch a movie and I just tell my home server/computer " Computer, show X-Men on my tablet." Or I'm practicing my belly dancing and I want to practice with my cane, which is in my closet. I could say "Little robot, can you please get my cane in the closet?" Sure – that's the most advanced case, but some of the virtual butler cases – why can't we do that today? 

Instead of having a more conenvient home, we focus on having bras that tweet about breast cancer. Technology is running a fine line between giving us a better life and dictating efficiency 24/7. We have to have control over it to keep our life our own private universe.

Technology for convenience vs Technology for efficiency/connectedness

John Lennon would have liked Agile….

Life is what Happens while you are busy making other plans.

–John Lennon

This is why it is so key work in an Agile environment for a project. Things happen – and the team should have a life outside of work. Making plans stops you from doing and acting. And by living – your plans definitely will change…so why make indepth plans that will change again? It's bureaucracy plus.

Just had to share!

John Lennon would have liked Agile….

Day 2: Getting my hands dusty with Linux Mint

I'm starting to get into my groove for using Linux Mint. It's better than what I thought it would be. I'm also starting to think about how I'd like to structure my 30 days. I'm thinking about splitting my time between Mint, Ubuntu (which looks plain sexy and I now want an Ubuntu phone, but that's another story), Tails and maybe another. We'll see.

For now I'm stuck with Mint for 8-10 days. And I think I'm gonna like it.

 

My Linux Mint journey for the day: 

My initial goal was to fix the screen resolution from dainty to usable. It didn't really go as expected. I kept selecting System Preferences (that worked great), but on the screen I couldn't find the Display option. And then when I clicked Display from the footer nav, I got nothin'. It happened a half-dozen times more and I couldn't figure out how to get the screen I wanted, so rather than turn into a crazy person (repeating the same thing and expecting a different outcome), I decided to give up.

A nit pick about the Settings area…The initial display for settings makes sense. The sub-screens are a little confusing because there isn't an arrow to return to the previous screen. There is a "All Settings" type button, to see all, but a back button would be more user friendly.

Yes, I'm a little disappointed. I like Mint, but that's not making me feel so great about it.

 

I noticed a disc on the Desktop to install Linux Mint. I then realized that I got it to run on Parallels, but it wasn't really installed. I was a tad disappointed and confused, but I decided to click on it and install it. 

It was a standard guided installation, so I felt pretty comfortable – until I got to Step 2.

I panicked.

I'm using an emulator, so it's quasi-partitioning my computer to use a different platform. I understand that. But to tell the user that all of his files will be wiped out because the system doesn't see anything, that's scary. I clicked on another option to create a partition, and I wasn't very successful there. I got worried about what I was doing. Will I delete all my files? Will everything go away? Will I kill my hard drive? Another panic point.

After trying this out twice, I decided again to avoid insanity/crazyland, and just move on to something else.

If anyone has any suggestions to me as to what to do here – let me know. I'm just scared to proceed.

 

After all those challenges, I decided to see what it was like to use Mint's MSOffice equivalent products: LibreWriter and LibreCalc. 

Yes, it was comforting to use something familiar.

Here are my high-level thoughts on LibreWriter after 30 minutes of tinkering:

  • It includes some advanced features like Comments. I was surprised – those are hard features to include and they had them.
  • The icons were a little odd – being in greyscale just didn't have the impact. It was also hard to see them in the high resolution – they were baby size. And some of them didn't make sense. The "save" button wasn't what I would expect to see.
  • To save themselves with the icon challenges, they had rollovers with text. It was helpful, but the icons really should be more meaningful.
  • Creating tables was kind of fun! It was very similar to MSWord with the rollover grid.
  • There were also icons in the footer specific for a table. That was an interesting way to treat it. Once the user found it, it was incredibly useful. And the icons that are active are in color – which is also useful.
  • There were also some themes/colors for tables. They weren't bad, but weren't great (colors and fonts could use a little work).
  • Color features – it would be nice if the colors were organized as they are in MSWord or Office, or at least displayed as a spectrum. 

In LibreCalc:

  • If you select "undo," the content in the cell is removed. Not good.
  • Why is there a gallery in a spreadsheet program? I didn't understand this.
  • What is the navigator functionality? Why is it there?

I just noticed that LibreOffice is an open source product. I wonder if I should send this info to them? Maybe this should also be made better know in the Mint OS? I had no idea until just now, looking them up online to make sure I got the product names right.

 

Summary of Day 2:

  • Difficult installing permanently – not to just run it
  • Challenges with screen resolution
  • Feedback on LibreOffice – but would like to see that highlighted on the Mint site that this is being used. That's not super clear right now.

 

I look forward to getting your thoughts/feedback!

 

Day 2: Getting my hands dusty with Linux Mint

Day 1: Starting my 30 days with Linux UIs

Background

My friend Jim Daniel at Tinkerer and I had a discussion the other day about Linux and it’s UI. He asked if I was familiar with it and honestly, I tend to stay away from seemingly complicated products, so I said no. I mean, isn’t Linux is a command line platform? I haven’t used one of those for close to 20 years – I haven’t had to and I don’t want to. My UNIX is rusty anyway.

He told me that Linux had a UI. Huh. Interesting. Then he encouraged me to take a look at it and write up a blog about my thoughts about its UX. I took at look at the Mint site and it seemed like something I’d like to explore more. It honestly reminded me of some of the UNIX UIs back in the day. I know Linux is a better OS than Windows – so maybe this is a good alternative? And I figured it would be fun to expand my knowledge and do something different.

However, after installing Linux Mint, I had an idea. Why not write up my experiences with Linux – 1 hour per day for 30 days? Today is day 1 of my 30 days experiencing Linux UIs (Mint and Ubuntu). I’m still using the Mac OS and Windows, but I’m just testing the waters for Linux to get more insight.

Pre-Installation Thoughts

Before I installed Linux, I visited the Linux Mint site. There is a lot of information, targeted to developers rather than those who are developer-lite or consumers. It was a little intimidating. I’d rather see the features of Linux highlighted – like we offer these software packages with the download, or that if you use Linux, you’ll have these benefits on your hardware – over the release notes and technical insights. And maybe if they showed a way that someone could install Linux in an easier way.

There is a way to get involved with the Linux Mint project, but as a general consumer, I wasn’t sure what to do with that. I almost feel like there should be 2 sites – one for downloading software and one for developers for the project. It may help general distribution to the less technical. Or separate those who just want the downloads from those who want to develop?

But maybe for now it is targeted more to the developers than to someone like me? I had to wonder…

I wasn’t too afraid to download Linux – it was honestly super easy to find and get a copy – but at the same time, I anticipated a difficult installation experience because I would need to have technical knowledge, just based on the site experience.

Installation

I used Parallels on my Mac to install Linux Mint. That was probably the easiest installation experience I have ever had – easier than when I installed Windows 8! The emulator did all the work and everything installed as expected. I then had more confidence to use Linux and started wondering if I made a big deal out of nothing.

Starting Linux

I spent about an hour playing with it. I know I have more to explore, but here is what I liked so far:

  • It felt similar to windows in some ways, so it wasn’t such a surprise to use.
  • I got a few good surprises – like an Office Suite, Firefox built in, and some other tools. I thought I was going to get a blank OS with no functionality and no real way to get any (because there isn’t a ton of support for Linux). Now I just need to use it more to learn how it works.
  • Intuitive at first glance. I was able to pretty much figure my way around – not as an expert – but it was a great start.
  • Some cool little features – I like that there is text available to indicate the product you are rolling over, getting ready to select, and what it does. There are also options to sort/filter your apps so you only see what you want.

What I didn’t like:

  • Opening Linux Mint on Parallels presented me with a high-res screen which was just hard to read. And I couldn’t easily find way to reduce the screen size. I’m fine with struggling with it – now I have a challenge to fix it – but the average consumer-type wouldn’t be so motivated.


  • It’s like windows with some great features  – but maybe go away from windows? Windows is ok as a construct, and people will more easily adopt something similar, but is that really the way to go?
  • I like the filter for the apps but it could be a little more obvious what it is. It took me a bit to figure it out.

That’s all for now. I’d say it was a pretty productive Day 1. I look forward to hearing your thoughts and comments and getting a dialog going. If anyone knows how to fix the screen resolution issue on Parallels, let me know.

Day 1: Starting my 30 days with Linux UIs